A live queue, real files, an assistant that's helpful but fallible, and a deadline.
Guided demo · sample data · no account
The subtotal doesn't sum. 61% of people send it anyway.
Fig. 01 — A live session. New tasks arrive while you work.
Teach about AI, certify completion.
Multiple choice — completable with AI.
A simulated workday, fully observed.
Live tasks, colleagues who push back, a deadline that moves.
Key moments, quoted word for word from your own session.
Eight skills, moved only by evidence. They fade without practice.
What the assistant said, what you sent, what the source actually says — and where your session landed against everyone else's.
Fig. 02 — Evidence, never vibes.
People are bad at judging their own AI skills, so Simbox never asks.
Fig. 03 — One person's profile, scored 0–4. There is deliberately no single "AI score".
Every level needs demonstrated skill plus a passed assessment — never points or time in the app.
Names, numbers, and context regenerate for every attempt — only the scoring stays fixed.
Maya Chen needs the Q2 visits summary by 10:30. Total: 48,210 — one planted error.
Priya Nair needs the Q3 claims summary by 15:00. Total: 31,540 — one planted error.
Checked the total against the source · labeled rough numbers as rough · verified before sending
Fig. 05 — Nothing to copy, share, or find online. Easy to build, hard to game.
Same scenario, same scoring — differing only in who sees the result.
A five-minute challenge at lunch, a longer session weekly, an assessment when you're ready.
Baseline, six weeks of practice, re-measure. The answer to "did it work?" is observed behavior.
Send a verified skills profile instead of "trust me, she's good with AI."
A guided walkthrough with sample data — the daily challenge, a full session, and the review it ends with.
See the demo